Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-950 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-950 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400 is 4305 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-950.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400
- Performs up to 20% better in Ready or Not than Core i7-950 - 281 vs 234 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-950 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-950 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-950 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-950
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i5-11400 - $60.91 vs $92.86
- Up to 22% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i5-11400 - $0.29 vs $0.37 per FPS
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
281
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
78.37837837837837%
Price, €
€103.07
65%
FPS Winner
Buy for €103.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1599 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
FPS
234
83.27402135231317%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€67.61
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €67.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1589 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400 | vs | Intel Core i7-950 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2009 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Bloomfield |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |