Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400 is 2023 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400
- Performs up to 20% better in Starfield than Core i3-6300 - 67 vs 56 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i5-11400 - $49.74 vs $92.86
- Up to 36% better value when playing Starfield than Core i5-11400 - $0.99 vs $1.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
67
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.54/FPS
64.28571428571428%
Price, €
€103.07
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for €103.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1537 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
56
83.5820895522388%
Value, €/FPS
€0.99/FPS
100%
Price, €
€55.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €55.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1532 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
1262
65.05154639175258%
Multi-Core
2539
34.78082191780822%
Intel Core i5-11400 | vs | Intel Core i3-6300 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |