Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400 is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400
- Performs up to 2% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-10320 - 163 vs 160 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 5% cheaper than Core i5-11400 - $87.75 vs $92.32
- Up to 3% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-11400 - $0.61 vs $0.63 per FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
163
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
96%
Price, €
€102.47
95%
FPS Winner
Buy for €102.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
160
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.61/FPS
100%
Price, €
€97.4
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €97.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400 | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |