Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400 is 3025 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400
- Performs up to 13% better in Apex Legends than Celeron G1610 - 288 vs 254 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i5-11400 - $27.05 vs $99.8
- Up to 68% better value when playing Apex Legends than Core i5-11400 - $0.12 vs $0.38 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
288
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
31%
Price, €
€110.78
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for €110.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18619 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
254
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18618 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |