Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400 outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400 is 3066 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400
- Performs up to 10% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-8350 - 140 vs 127 FPS
- Up to 26% cheaper than FX-8350 - $99.8 vs $135.27
- Up to 33% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than FX-8350 - $0.79 vs $1.18 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
140
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.79/FPS
100%
Price, €
€110.78
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €110.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13632 minutes ago
Buy for €150.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13631 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |