Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400 outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400 is 3443 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400
- Performs up to 29% better in Minecraft than FX-8120 - 771 vs 596 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8120 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i5-11400 - $29.24 vs $99.8
- Up to 64% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i5-11400 - $0.05 vs $0.14 per FPS
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
771
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
35%
Price, €
€110.78
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for €110.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17559 minutes ago
Buy for €32.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17559 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400 | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |