Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11300H outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11300H is 2317 days newer than Xeon E5-2667 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11300H
- Performs up to 29% better in War Thunder than Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 197 vs 153 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Core i5-11300H
Mobile • Jan 11th, 2021
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11300H | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 11th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Tiger Lake | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
| Intel BGA 1449 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 135 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Iris XE 80EU | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
