Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 1410 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 8% better in Battlefield V than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 248 vs 229 FPS
- Up to 9% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $90.67 vs $99.89
- Up to 15% better value when playing Battlefield V than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $0.41 vs $0.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 12 vs 8 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
248
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€100.64
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €100.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10302 minutes ago
Buy for €110.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10302 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600KF | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |