Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600KF and the cheaper Core i5-10400F have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-10400F - 193 vs 188 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - $73.09 vs $90.67
- Up to 17% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-10600KF - $0.43 vs $0.52 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
193
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
82%
Price, €
€100.64
80%
FPS Winner
Buy for €100.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18580 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
188
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.13
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €81.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18580 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600KF | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |