Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-2100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 3357 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2100.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 9% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-2100 - 209 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2100 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2100
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - $35.83 vs $89.94
- Up to 56% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i5-10600KF - $0.21 vs $0.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
209
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
43%
Price, €
€99.83
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for €99.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
FPS
191
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€39.77
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €39.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 149 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600KF | vs | Intel Core i3-2100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Feb 20th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |