Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 973 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 3% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 174 vs 169 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 9% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - $80.42 vs $88.09
- Up to 5% better value when playing Forza Horizon 5 than Core i5-10600KF - $0.53 vs $0.56 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 16 vs 12 threads
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
174
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.56/FPS
94%
Price, €
€97.78
91%
FPS Winner
Buy for €97.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 132 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
169
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.53/FPS
100%
Price, €
€89.27
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €89.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 132 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600KF | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |