Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 2923 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 18% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-3770 - 111 vs 94 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - $65.81 vs $102.78
- Up to 24% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-10600K - $0.78 vs $1.03 per FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 77 vs 95 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
111
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.03/FPS
75%
Price, €
€114.09
64%
FPS Winner
Buy for €114.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 113 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
94
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.78/FPS
100%
Price, €
€73.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €73.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600K | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |