Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - $105.07 vs $1023.66
- Up to 89% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i7-13700F - $0.42 vs $3.93 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 3% better in F1 22 than Core i5-10600K - 289 vs 280 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600K - 24 vs 12 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
280
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€116.63
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €116.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17932 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
289
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.93/FPS
10%
Price, €
€1136.26
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,136.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17931 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600K | vs | Intel Core i7-13700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |