Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10600K outperforms the more expensive Core i5-9600KF on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10600K is 478 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-9600KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 1% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-9600KF - 136 vs 135 FPS
- Up to 9% cheaper than Core i5-9600KF - $99.79 vs $109.68
- Up to 10% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-9600KF - $0.81 vs $0.9 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600KF - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
136
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.81/FPS
100%
Price, €
€110.77
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €110.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1602 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
135
99.26470588235294%
Value, €/FPS
€0.9/FPS
90%
Price, €
€121.75
90%
Buy for €121.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1601 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Single-Core
1587
95.71773220747889%
Multi-Core
5707
83.46007604562737%
Intel Core i5-10600K | vs | Intel Core i5-9600KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |