Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400 is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i5-13400 - $99.79 vs $147.22
- Up to 21% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-13400 - $0.19 vs $0.24 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400
- Performs up to 14% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-10600K - 672 vs 590 FPS
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
590
87.79761904761905%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€110.77
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €110.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1722 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
672
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
79.16666666666667%
Price, €
€163.41
67%
FPS Winner
Buy for €163.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1726 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1658
72.4967205946655%
Multi-Core
6838
65.97838672327286%
Intel Core i5-10600K | vs | Intel Core i5-13400 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |