Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 2110 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Core i3-4160 - 154 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - $8.4 vs $96.02
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 54 vs 95 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €106.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 237 minutes ago
Buy for €9.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 239 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1064
64.17370325693607%
Multi-Core
2072
30.301257677683534%
Intel Core i5-10600K | vs | Intel Core i3-4160 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |