Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K and the cheaper Core i3-10320 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i3-10320 - 135 vs 134 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 16% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - $87.75 vs $105.07
- Up to 15% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i5-10600K - $0.73 vs $0.86 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
135
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.86/FPS
84%
Price, €
€116.63
83%
FPS Winner
Buy for €116.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4330 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
134
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.73/FPS
100%
Price, €
€97.4
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €97.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4329 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600K | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |