Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 2985 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 12% better in F1 22 than FX-6200 - 280 vs 250 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - $31.32 vs $100.17
- Up to 65% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i5-10600K - $0.14 vs $0.4 per FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
280
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.4/FPS
35%
Price, €
€111.19
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for €111.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 230 minutes ago
Buy for €34.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 229 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600K | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 3 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |