Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10600 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-7600K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10600 is 1213 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-7600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600
- Performs up to 1% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-7600K - 134 vs 133 FPS
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i5-7600K - $102.37 vs $124.3
- Up to 18% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-7600K - $0.85 vs $1.04 per FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i5-7600K - 65 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600K - 12 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
134
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.85/FPS
100%
Price, €
€113.63
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €113.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 154 minutes ago
Buy for €137.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 155 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600 | vs | Intel Core i5-7600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |