Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600 outperforms the cheaper FX-8370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600 is 2067 days newer than the cheaper FX-8370.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600
- Performs up to 54% better in F1 23 than FX-8370 - 233 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8370 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8370 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8370
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i5-10600 - $181.35 vs $387.5
- Up to 28% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i5-10600 - $1.33 vs $1.85 per FPS
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
233
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.85/FPS
71.89189189189189%
Price, €
€430.12
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for €430.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
FPS
151
64.8068669527897%
Value, €/FPS
€1.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€201.3
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €201.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600 | vs | AMD FX-8370 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |