Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10600 outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10600 is 2746 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600
- Performs up to 148% better in Immortals of Aveum than FX-6300 - 57 vs 23 FPS
- Up to 59% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than FX-6300 - $1.41 vs $3.46 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 1% cheaper than Core i5-10600 - $71.68 vs $72.39
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
57
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€80.35
99%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €80.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3243 minutes ago
Buy for €79.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3236 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |