Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600 outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600 is 162 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600
- Performs up to 25% better in F1 23 than Athlon 3000G - 233 vs 186 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i5-10600 - $38.36 vs $102.37
- Up to 53% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i5-10600 - $0.23 vs $0.49 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
233
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.49/FPS
46%
Price, €
€113.63
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for €113.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 179 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
186
79%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€42.58
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €42.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 180 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Athlon |
Comet Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |