Buy on Amazon
€162.86
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10500 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10500 is 3399 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10500
- Performs up to 19% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i5-2300 - 130 vs 109 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-2300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2300 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2300
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i5-10500 - $32.9 vs $146.72
- Up to 73% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i5-10500 - $0.34 vs $1.25 per FPS
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i5-10500
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
130
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.25/FPS
27.200000000000003%
Price, €
€162.86
22%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i5-10500 Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.5 GHz LGA1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W, Model Number: BX8070110500
Buy for €162.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1655 minutes ago
Core i5-2300
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
109
83.84615384615385%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€36.52
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5-2300 2.80GHz Quad-Core Desktop Processor
Buy for €36.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1647 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i5-10500
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Core i5-2300
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-2300
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
510
33.57472021066491%
Multi-Core
1490
27.239488117001827%
Intel Core i5-10500 | vs | Intel Core i5-2300 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.