Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9940X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9940X is 559 days older than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i9-9940X - $76.77 vs $1015.53
- Up to 92% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Core i9-9940X - $0.73 vs $9.55 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-9940X - 65 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9940X
- Performs up to 1% better in The Callisto Protocol than Core i5-10400F - 118 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 28 vs 12 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
117
99.15254237288136%
Value, €/FPS
€0.73/FPS
100%
Price, €
€85.22
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €85.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1596 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
118
100%
Value, €/FPS
€9.55/FPS
7.643979057591623%
Price, €
€1127.24
7%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,127.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1594 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1438
98.56065798492118%
Multi-Core
5751
53.57741755170486%
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i9-9940X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 14 |
12 | Threads | 28 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |