Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700KF is 478 days older than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i7-9700KF - $71.3 vs $182.8
- Up to 59% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i7-9700KF - $0.31 vs $0.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700KF - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700KF
- Performs up to 3% better in Lost Ark than Core i5-10400F - 266 vs 258 FPS
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
258
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€79.14
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €79.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
266
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.76/FPS
40%
Price, €
€202.91
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for €202.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i7-9700KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |