Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-860 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 3887 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i7-860 - 205 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-860 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-860 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - $35.09 vs $73.09
- Up to 48% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i5-10400F - $0.21 vs $0.4 per FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €81.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6552 minutes ago
Buy for €38.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6552 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i7-860 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |