Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700K is 1734 days older than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i7-6700K - $73.09 vs $131.61
- Up to 43% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i7-6700K - $0.28 vs $0.49 per FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700K - 65 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700K - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Performs up to 0% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i5-10400F - 296 vs 295 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
295
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.13
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €81.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9870 minutes ago
Buy for €146.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9870 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i7-6700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |