Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 3111 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 8% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-2700K - 122 vs 113 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-2700K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2700K - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - $65.07 vs $73.09
- Up to 3% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-10400F - $0.64 vs $0.66 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
122
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.66/FPS
96%
Price, €
€81.13
89%
FPS Winner
Buy for €81.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9049 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
FPS
113
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.64/FPS
100%
Price, €
€72.23
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €72.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9049 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i7-2700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |