Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2524 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 2% better in Escape From Tarkov than Core i5-4670S - 208 vs 203 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670S - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670S
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - $40.41 vs $73.09
- Up to 44% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Core i5-10400F - $0.22 vs $0.39 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
208
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
56%
Price, €
€81.13
55%
FPS Winner
Buy for €81.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18465 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
203
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€44.85
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €44.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18466 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i5-4670S |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |