Buy on Amazon
€81.13
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms Core i5-4300M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2433 days newer than Core i5-4300M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 10% better in World of Warcraft than Core i5-4300M - 184 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4300M - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4300M
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 37 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i5-10400F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
184
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.13
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-10400F (Base Clock: 2.90 GHz; Socket: LGA1200; 65 Watt) Box
Buy for €81.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5942 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i5-10400F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Core i5-4300M
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i5-4300M |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 37 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 5000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.