Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3470 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3470 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2890 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3470.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 32% better in War Thunder than Core i5-3470 - 182 vs 138 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-3470 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - $43.14 vs $73.09
- Up to 22% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i5-10400F - $0.35 vs $0.45 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
182
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.45/FPS
77%
Price, €
€81.13
59%
FPS Winner
Buy for €81.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4054 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
138
75%
Value, €/FPS
€0.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€47.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €47.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4054 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i5-3470 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |