Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2405S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2405S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 3266 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2405S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 15% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Core i5-2405S - 142 vs 124 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2405S - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2405S
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - $33.63 vs $73.09
- Up to 47% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i5-10400F - $0.3 vs $0.57 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
142
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.57/FPS
52%
Price, €
€81.13
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for €81.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18812 minutes ago
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
FPS
124
87%
Value, €/FPS
€0.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€37.33
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €37.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18811 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i5-2405S |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | May 22nd, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | No |