Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 1348 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - $73.09 vs $153.54
- Up to 50% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-14400F - $0.51 vs $1.03 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 4% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-10400F - 165 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 16 vs 12 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
159
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.51/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.13
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €81.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13875 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
165
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.03/FPS
49%
Price, €
€170.43
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for €170.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13874 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |