Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600 and the cheaper Core i5-10400F have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i5-10600 - $73.09 vs $109.68
- Up to 33% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-10600 - $0.48 vs $0.72 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600
- Performs up to 1% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-10400F - 170 vs 168 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
168
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.13
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €81.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1927 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
170
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.72/FPS
66%
Price, €
€121.75
66%
FPS Winner
Buy for €121.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1927 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i5-10600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |