Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4170 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4170 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2191 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4170.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 2% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i3-4170 - 182 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4170 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4170
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - $30.42 vs $71.06
- Up to 56% better value when playing Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i5-10400F - $0.19 vs $0.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
182
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.43/FPS
44.18604651162791%
Price, €
€78.88
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for €78.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
179
98.35164835164835%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€33.77
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €33.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1101
76.56467315716272%
Multi-Core
2130
37.03703703703704%
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i3-4170 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |