Buy on Amazon
€81.13
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 320 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 1% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i3-10105 - 209 vs 207 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - $65.77 vs $73.09
- Up to 10% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i5-10400F - $0.35 vs $0.39 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i5-10400F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
209
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
89%
Price, €
€81.13
89%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i5-10400F (Base Clock: 2.90 GHz; Socket: LGA1200; 65 Watt) Box
Buy for €81.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10778 minutes ago
Core i3-10105
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
207
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€73.01
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i3 (10th Gen) i3-10105 Quad-core (4 Core) 3.70 GHz Processor - Retail Pack
Buy for €73.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10777 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i5-10400F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Core i3-10105
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.