Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2890 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Celeron G550 - 205 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - $35.83 vs $73.09
- Up to 48% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i5-10400F - $0.21 vs $0.4 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €81.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18230 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
189
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€39.77
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €39.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18229 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Celeron G550 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |