Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 1703 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 24% better in Rust than Celeron G3900 - 197 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - $29.18 vs $72.93
- Up to 51% better value when playing Rust than Core i5-10400F - $0.2 vs $0.41 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
197
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
48.78048780487806%
Price, €
€80.95
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for €80.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52874 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
159
80.71065989847716%
Value, €/FPS
€0.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€32.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €32.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52872 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
40.403337969401946%
Multi-Core
992
17.249174056685792%
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |