Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10400F is 576 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 1% better in The Outer Worlds than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 204 vs 202 FPS
- Up to 91% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $73.09 vs $840.87
- Up to 91% better value when playing The Outer Worlds than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $0.4 vs $4.62 per FPS
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 65 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 48 vs 12 threads
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
204
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.13
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €81.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5046 minutes ago
Buy for €933.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5046 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 48 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 250 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |