Buy on Amazon
€77.83
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $799
Availability
MSRP in USD: $799
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10400F is 994 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 3% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 250 vs 242 FPS
- Up to 64% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $70.12 vs $197.42
- Up to 66% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $0.31 vs $0.91 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 24 vs 12 threads
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i5-10400F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
250
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€77.83
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-10400F (Base Clock: 2.90 GHz; Socket: LGA1200; 65 Watt) Box
Buy for €77.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
242
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.91/FPS
34%
Price, €
€219.14
35%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X (12-Core/24-Thread) Desktop Processor (YD192XA8AEWOF)
Buy for €219.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i5-10400F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 12 |
| 12 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.