Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8845HS outperforms Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 8845HS is 1315 days newer than Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
- Performs up to 9% better in Deathloop than Core i5-10400F - 194 vs 178 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
178
91.75257731958763%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
100%
Price, €
€85.22
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €85.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4024 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Mobile • Dec 6th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1438
57.84392598551891%
Multi-Core
5751
49.27598320623768%
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Dec 6th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 45 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
No | Overclockable | No |