Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600X is 298 days older than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 48% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600X - $72.93 vs $138.93
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600X - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
- Performs up to 2% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-10400F - 124 vs 122 FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €80.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74648 minutes ago
Buy for €154.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74647 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1438
87.57612667478685%
Multi-Core
5751
82.15714285714286%
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |