Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 4007 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 7% better in Valheim than Phenom II X4 925 - 201 vs 188 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €78.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 270 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Single-Core
320
22.253129346314328%
Multi-Core
930
16.17110067814293%
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | AMD Phenom II X4 925 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | May 11th, 2009 |
Core i5 | Collection | Phenom II X4 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Deneb |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 14.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | No |