Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G3258 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G3258 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 2159 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G3258.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 10% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Pentium G3258 - 188 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3258 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3258
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i5-10400 - $36.1 vs $91.04
- Up to 57% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-10400 - $0.23 vs $0.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400 - 53 vs 65 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
188
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.54/FPS
42%
Price, €
€101.05
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for €101.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16120 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FPS
171
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€40.07
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €40.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16120 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400 | vs | Intel Pentium G3258 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Pentium |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |