Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $95.17 vs $318.06
- Up to 67% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i9-13900F - $0.2 vs $0.61 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 9% better in World of Tanks than Core i5-10400 - 582 vs 534 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400 - 32 vs 12 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
534
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€105.64
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €105.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
582
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.61/FPS
32%
Price, €
€353.05
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for €353.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |