Buy on Amazon
€99.5
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770S on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 2923 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 4% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i7-3770S - 217 vs 208 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770S - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770S
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i5-10400 - $71.21 vs $89.64
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i5-10400 Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.3 GHz LGA1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 65W, Model Number: BX8070110400
Buy for €99.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 235 minutes ago
Intel Core i7-3770S Quad-Core Processor 3.1 GHz 8 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80637I73770S
Buy for €79.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 233 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-10400
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Core i7-3770S
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3770S
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
669
46.78321678321679%
Multi-Core
2234
40.6995809801421%
Intel Core i5-10400 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770S |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.