Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 1348 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - $91.04 vs $270.23
- Up to 56% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-14700F - $0.18 vs $0.41 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 32% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-10400 - 738 vs 561 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400 - 28 vs 12 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
561
76%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€101.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €101.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18702 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
738
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
43%
Price, €
€299.95
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for €299.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18701 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400 | vs | Intel Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 20 |
12 | Threads | 28 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |