Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 3574 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 10% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-760 - 122 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-760 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i5-10400 - $73.12 vs $90.66
- Up to 11% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-10400 - $0.73 vs $0.82 per FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
122
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.82/FPS
89%
Price, €
€100.63
80%
FPS Winner
Buy for €100.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
111
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.73/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €81.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400 | vs | Intel Core i5-760 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 18th, 2010 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |