Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-5675C on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-5675C is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 1812 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-5675C.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 0% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i5-5675C - 242 vs 241 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-5675C - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5675C
- Up to 27% cheaper than Core i5-10400 - $65.81 vs $90.66
- Up to 29% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i5-10400 - $0.3 vs $0.42 per FPS
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
242
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
71.42857142857143%
Price, €
€100.63
72%
FPS Winner
Buy for €100.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2306 minutes ago
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
FPS
241
99.58677685950413%
Value, €/FPS
€0.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€73.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €73.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2302 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
Single-Core
1340
93.7062937062937%
Multi-Core
4079
74.31226088540718%
Intel Core i5-10400 | vs | Intel Core i5-5675C |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | May 15th, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Broadwell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |