Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10300H outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10300H is 715 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10300H
- Performs up to 2% better in New World than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 114 vs 112 FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 45 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10300H - 24 vs 8 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
112
98%
Value, €/FPS
€5.02/FPS
100%
Price, €
€561.72
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €561.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Sep 17th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10300H | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 17th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |